Additional Comments Here. This is
the #1 article on Couples Company for 10-years straight! It's been used as a
study aid at several universities and quoted in the mainstream press.
|
Opinion |

I read
with interest your article and agree with your position. I find it
very telling that the people that are providing such vehement denial
to your article are so easily identified by the first sign - A
Powerful and Continuing Nationalism. Their own anger and vehement
disagreement coupled with suggestions that those in opposition ought
leave - well, wow, nothing more needs be said, nor any defense
mounted. To put it crudely - "the smeller's the feller." I have also
found it very odd that true Christian viewpoints, 'love thy
neighbor', 'thou shall not kill', and others, are so blatantly
disregarded by the very people who profess the strongest allegiance
to the Christian faith; this group is the most likely to support the
continued slaughter of thousands of innocent people (in Iraq and
elsewhere) while ignoring horrible human suffering like that in
Darfur. I cannot find any response to why this ideology is justified
based on true 'Christian' beliefs. I would be very interested in
seeing some justification for the continued execution of this
slaughter in Iraq considering the Biblical principles I have listed
above, especially considering the failed (hunt for WMD's) or
completed (capture of Saddam) goals in the besieged country. To
further update your article, I would point only to the recent debate
on bringing "Intelligent Design" into the science classroom as
entwining government and religious beliefs, and the lack of response
to Katrina and the minorities most affected as an issue of racial
inequality. I understand there will always be a fanatical right wing
segment of society as well as a fanatical left wing component. I
think it is healthy that all viewpoints are allowed to exist.
However, it has become so recently obvious that the right wing
agenda has taken such a front seat at such a financial and ethical
cost that even your detractors must realize that no nation,
regardless of how great, can support such moral and financial debt
for a protracted period of time without either a severe burden on
its citizens (via immense taxation, which some might agree is here
already) or complete collapse as was the case with the Roman Empire.
MB (M) 35
San Diego, CA.
Response: I
have more fun reading the responses to this article. Who would
have thought a definition of Fascism would cause such a stir! --
One fact I recently discovered. No country ruled as a
theocracy has ever survived. It is a death sentence regardless of
the faith. This is one of the reasons our founding fathers placed
the separation of Church and state in the Bill of Rights. This is
different than a country being founded upon the moral values of a
faith and allowing these into the culture to create a common
benchmark of behavior, expectations, values and character. The
secularization of society, the removing of God also results in the
complete destruction of society. This is a key reason
Communism failed. It also applies to Rome and many of the
former empires, something to which you touch on above.
|
|
|
Opinion |
|
An
interesting note to end this article.... Realistic fascist examples
are found in Venezuela, Cuba, South Africa, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. You
have chosen a clever fifth columnist's approach ( convenient,
Spain's civil war) to show the US and Israel as nations with fascist
characteristics. Do attempt to live in some of the countries I
mentioned above, and publish opinions critical of the local or
central government, you are likely to be charged as a traitor and a
Yankee spy. And yes, I understand how the Library of Congress
defines fascism, don't hide there.
EM (F) 25
San Diego, CA.
Response: EM, I'm not
hiding in the Library of Congress. I cannot confirm or deny
Venezuela, Cuba, South Africa, Yemen, and Zimbabwe are also fascist.
I have not done an in-depth study into their laws, culture or
leadership. People often confuse dictatorships with fascism.
I'd have to spend time going into the particulars of these nations
to state with conviction whether they are or are not. I believe
South Africa once was but even Nelson Mandela has publicly stated
that apartheid in South Africa was not as rigid or destructive as it
is for those under Israeli occupation. What he witnessed in
Palestine surpassed the worst he'd seen in South Africa. Since he's
lived it, I tend to believe his assessment. Thanks for the
homework:)
I have
done an in-depth study into Israel and the United States. Israel I
can confirm is fascist if you are not white Jewish, (Arab and
persons of color in Israel who are Jewish are often treated as
second class citizens). The Talmudism underlying Israel's rabbinic
code, laws and character fully contribute to this situation.
It is also a theocracy and military based government. Fascism is how
it chooses to rule. Israel is not, nor has it ever been a democracy.
You might try reading Israel's Constitution...don't spend too
much time looking for it. It doesn't, nor has it ever existed.
As for being critical
and being free to speak in the US, you're missing several very big
stories of censorship.
They're
not throwing us in jail yet but ask Clark, Ritter, O'Neill, Zinny
what happens if you go against the Bush Administration.
If the Senate passes
S.1145, which they are expected to
do in October 2005, people will go to jail in the United States for
voicing opinions or standing up to their faith. This bill, referred
to as the Local Law Enforcement Act and Anti-Hate Crimes Bill of
2005 (this bill hides behind the "hate crimes" moniker to hide what
it really is) violates the First Amendment (freedom of speech,
freedom to practice one's faith:
Congress shall make no
law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
press; );
The Fourth Amendment (absence of probable cause--arrest/report based
upon the police officer's determination of the complainant)
Fifth Amendment (No
person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime without due process of law) with this law the police officer
is judge and jury. If he/she finds you guilty, you are noted
in the Federal Criminal databases as a Hate Criminal) the Sixth
Amendment: (In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the
state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed).
If you are accused of a hate crime, you don't get a trial. The
police officer decides alone if you are guilty; And the Tenth
Amendment, (The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to
the states respectively, or to the people.)
Hate crimes are
the dominion of the state. This bill inserts the federal
government into the state's realm and your home, permanently. This
bill is spearheaded by the Anti-defamation League, an organization
that says it fights racism in the US but fully funds, supports and
defends it in Israel. Do as we say not as we do, this is one of
those inconsistencies that points to propaganda and ulterior
motives. The ADL functions, and this has been proven
numerous times in court beginning in 1989 as Israel's intelligence
gathering arm in the US. It has in-depth files on tens of
thousands of Americans and its purpose is to protect Israeli
interests at all costs. It profits from this bill because it
wrote the manual used by the FBI to define "hate crimes". These are
not common sense definitions. These are definitions which
support ADL agendas and silence its critics.
Senate Bill 1145 allows
via ADL definitions, training and insertion to
jail Americans protesting the political movement known as Zionism,
adhering to, teaching or quoting monotheistic teachings on Homosexuality and many other
issues as "Hate Criminals". The truth is irrelevant. The
hate crime is defined by stating what is true, challenging
historical facts or following your faith. This Act
outlaws truth and many key beliefs found in Christianity, Judaism
and Islam in the United States. It also creates a class of super
citizens who are immune from specific prosecution due to their
behaviors, political affiliations or faith.
If this bill,
tantamount to mind control which incorporates police state justice
doesn't sound like fascism to you, what do you call it? And the
above is just one example of the laws this administration has been
passing pushing us toward complete fascism. I don't want to
live like this, do you? --LDL
|
|
Opinion |

Dear Ms.
Lewis, I was pleasantly surprised in reading your article, because
it treats the subject fairly. I would argue that you didn’t make
your case that fascism is a government structure. In fact nowhere
does your article describe how fascism actually governs. This is
because fascism is, in fact, a method - not government.
Nevertheless, the article is good. I have to admit, you had me
going. I thought I would be treated to an academically rigorous
article.
Then I
saw the 14 points. Granted, you claim the definition comes from the
Library of Congress, but you haven’t cited the work. Then you claim
that the US fits this ‘profile’ of fascism. Your intellectually
honesty disappears into a tirade against our current leadership and
Israel. A point driven home in your responses to these reader
comments. I look forward to your article on how the USA have
fulfilled these 14 points. It should be entertaining reading, if not
academically rigorous.
Regards, Phil Godfrin p.s. I agree with Mike – try living in a real
fascist dictatorship (Cuba or Syria for example). I think you’ll
change your tune about our great country in a hurry.
PG (M) 43
Flemmington, NJ
Response: The
14-points are not from the Library of Congress. They were
created by
Dr. Lawrence Britt
upon his study of 5 fascist based countries and I reproduced them as
he wrote them.
I agree with you
that Fascism is more of a method rather than structure.
LOC has it as a structure, but I think you're right.
Eventually I'm going to tighten up this article and throw in the 14
points with links. Based upon the response it appears I'll
need to do two: One for the US and one for Israel. Israel is
actually the easier of the two.
Secondly, you're stating one needs to live under fascism to
recognize its infringements or manifestation? No wonder
countries become fascist. Nobody knows they are until it is
too late. That argument is like saying we cannot recognize child
abuse unless we've been abused. It discounts prevention and
education making people victims rather than responsible for their
destiny. I'm an American and I don't play victim. By not
playing victim, I speak up even when it is hard to do or not
popular.
The
statement about Israel seems to irritate a lot of people. I was researching Israel
and kept coming up against laws, practices and policies that I
thought were fascist because they reminded me of Nazi Germany. Laws
preventing non-Jews from getting building permits. Laws
forcing non-Jews to attend different schools, walk different
streets, forfeit their homes and lands to Jews, not work in Jewish
businesses. etc, etc, etc...I
decided to check my perception. The definition confirmed it.
I classify Israel as a Fascist/Military/Theocratic/Republic, not a Fascist Dictatorship. It is not a dictatorship,
nor is the US. As far as I know, neither have been. By the
way, since it is not a dictatorship but a republic, the Israeli
people can change this if they want. But first they have to
admit what they're doing. Some do. Most won't.
You are mistaken
if you think I do not love my country. I do. I feel
privileged to be born in America, however I am not proud of how we
currently behave. Pride is not an excuse for complacency.
What I see happening in the United States today, very slowly like a
frog boiling to death one degree at a time, shows that if we keep on
this course we're on, we'll kill ourselves. I want the United
States to be around as a republic, the way it was intended two
hundred years from now. If we don't address these small nicks
at our freedoms now, our children will not have the country we live
in. It will be something completely different. Based upon your
comments, I think we can agree on that. Thanks for writing in.
--LDL |
|
Opinion |

September
4, 2005
Dear
Laura,
Your
article on Fascism is one of the most biased articles I have ever
read about Fascism. Do you even have a clue as to what Fascism is
all about? You claim that Fascism is based on 'race hatred' or using
the middle-class to 'exploit' the working class 'Revolution' What
crap honestly! In Fascist Italy Mussolini did not get into power for
feeding of off race problems ior anti-Semitism. In fact the Fascists
in Italy were not nor were they ever 'racist'. The Italian Fascist
Party in fact had members from the area of Sicily in lower Italy who
are characteristically 'darker skinned'. Not to mention the
chief-rabbi of Rome was a member of the Fascist Party with other
Jewish members. Even when war broke out and Mussolini aligned
himself with Hitler, the anti-Semitic legislation enacted in Italy
wasn't not enforce strictly and was only there to appease Hitler.
And as far as that ridiculous remark about 'Fascism being used as a
tool to thwart the working class revolution' I think it is worth
mentioning that Mussolini and the Fascists had a huge support base
for the working class. You see the Fascists started out as
Socialists but evolved into a movement with national-characteristics
and saw the folly of class-warfare to achieve a desired aim. Instead
they used class-collaboration to achieve class harmony and this
worked very well. You are obviously an intelligent person but a
little more research into Fascism before you fill it up with blatant
Marxist lies is needed. I would suggest reading A. James Gregor book
Phoenix: Fascism in Our Time for unbiased research on Fascism. Good
Day, Simon
SAN, (M) 23
Leigh-On-Sea, Essex, England
Comment:
What you're citing as biased is LOC's words and definition so does
that mean you think the US Government is biased? (You might find me
agreeing with you there on specific issues). And what is the point
with bringing up WWII again? Is this a return to victimization
focus or what?
You're missing
some key information on the rise, implementation and enforcement of
anti-Semitism, fascism and the role of Zionism in WWII Europe.
Please visit
Jews
Against Zionism for the details. You're practicing the
accepted line but your facts are a bit skewed.
Fascism's been
around a lot longer than the eighteenth century and French
Revolution which I think is what you're referring to with the
socialism turning into Fascism...or is it Russia?
To everyone else:
This is a good example of why journalists don't cover or criticize
Israel. You'll notice the definition isn't the issue although
he doesn't like the language, (personally I find the revolutionary
early twentieth century official terminology a bit irritating as
well so we agree there too) He's angry, like most of the negative
remarks over the fact I dared to pinpoint Israeli policies fascist.
You'll notice not one person attempts to prove me wrong, (they
can't). They simply defame me.
And yes, Simon, I
have read the book. Good day to you too. It's quite lovely in
Essex:)
--LDL |
MORE Comments
Return to What
is Fascism
Submit Your Opinion |